|
THE BIG SO WHAT [The anti-gravity effect and a little more] To you know who and for Carl Sagan (please; no reading-ahead mostly for your own fun) ...then, in the first moment, everything; space, time and energy expanded outward from 0 to 1 to 2 to 3 and more spacial dimensions and at least one dimension of *time. As the expanse expanded something caused pockets of energy to begin to congregate and form pockets of high matter density and vast areas of lower matter density. I do not know what caused this, however, sonic waves in a uniform sphere of uniform density creates points of overlapping vibration which could be related to the early universe finding spacial intersections that either attracted or repelled matter. There must be an explanation for why the universe is not perfectly uniform (no clumps) as the universe is very void-like now with huge numbers of photons interlacing large numbers of tiny aggregations of space-time-attracting-localizations-of-energy floating in a sea of expanding electro-magnetized-distance.
*Time. I'm leaving room for one extra dimension of "negative" time here. I have a time-travel guess that would make the total energy of the universe zero, explains the original anti-matter matter annihilations and perhaps explains zero point energy. But, I no longer want time travel and this is a wild guess (from a delirious all-night'r preparing for a quantum final) and I super-doubt this is important in terms of where this article is going. Anything more on this is probably a distraction; onward...
Closer to knowing something
Within the last 50 years it has been noticed that every galaxy is more or less moving away from every other galaxy. Every direction we look into space we find matter outside of our galaxy, almost always, moving away from us and only close stuff is coming towards us... such as Andromeda. Looking at time in reverse it can be concluded that every galaxy would be closer together in the past, to a point in the past, from which everything, including distance, originated; the big bang.
Apparently there is an effect that causes space to expand. As in distance (space) is being created per time, in all directions, everywhere. In a hypothetical reality you could stand next to the universe (outside of it) and not be aware of the universe. One way to think of this is to think of the energy of the universe as being held to a ridiculously small outside radius, but because space is being created by the universe inside of the universe only the inside of the dot would be getting bigger not the outside.
A time known as the "rapid inflation" occurred shortly after the big bang. For a time period the universe expanded faster than the speed of light (more on the speed of light later). The universe expanded then, the universe expanded more quickly then the rate of expansion began to slow down and now is speeding up again faster and faster to this day. My guess on this is that during certain ages a more than average number of photons were released from decaying particles due to interactions now being allowed by the temperature of the universe. The space around where the mass just was can now relax into the universe. Because mass in the universe can't stop bleeding photons gravity lost the fight, then had a chance, then super-lost the fight. No big crunch on the horizon in other words.
There appears to be a relationship between the speed of light and the density of Electro Magnetic (EM) field. The more spread out the EM field the slower the speed of light. In space the speed of light is about 3*10^8 meters per second or 186,000 miles per second currently for yellow light. It's about a second and a half to the moon and back. I have heard rumors for years that the measured speed of light is slowing down and this would be consistent with an ever increasingly expanding universe. The way light transmits is somewhat analogous to standing on train tracks with a friend a quarter mile down the line. If you smash the rails with a hammer and yell at the same time the "sound waves" will transmit through the more dense material (the rails) faster than open air. This is a noticeable effect; something like a quarter second difference in the time that the rail delivers the signal versus the air that delivers the signal a short time after.
At this time I want to add that anytime you have heard "laws of physics" or "constants of the universe" (such as the speed of light) simply don't trust this anymore. What we observe now by no means implies that the universe was working precisely the same in the past. There seems to be a relationship between the fundamental forces of nature and the temperature of the universe. And the overall temperature of the universe has been decreasing from the beginning. There are some reasons to believe that at the start the forces of nature were equal to each other, unity. Now gravity is incredibly weak and this is probably related to temperature.
The symphony tunes before the stage comes alive
Usually the topic of life is about this planet but I'm going to start a little earlier than that... Shortly after the big bang occurred matter was far too hot (vibrating wildly) to form anything we would recognize today (other than for a few moments of time in a high-energy particle accelerator). As things cooled during the first few seconds particles were able to form for the first time. Shortly after this these particles would combine to form atoms. Stable energy exists as matter at the intersection of numerous dimensional parameters (the E8 model contains this information but be careful about accepting upper dimensions the math there probably means something else). The first instance of electrons binding to a nucleus would release the first light of the universe; a huge number of photons racing in every direction more or less. Now this radiation has cooled (spread throughout the universe more or less uniformly) and is detected today. When using an old TV set with an antenna and watching a blank station 1 to 5% of the choas on the screen is from shortly after the big bang This is called the "cosmic microwave background radiation" discovered 1964.
Some time after the formation of atoms massive clouds of hydrogen and some helium would begin to coalesce. Hydrogen is one proton and usually one electron and helium is 2 protons and 2 electrons with either one or 2 neutrons in the nucleus with the protons. The limited combinations of these 2 atoms is not enough to start up life yet, something pretty important had to happen first.
These clouds of dust began to rotate and condense. Eventually, maybe around a 100 million years into the universe, these massive clouds of dust become rotating spheres and the pressure in the middle becomes so hot and dense that the cores ignite. Light elements are fused to create some heavier elements while during these formations photons are released.
The force of gravity is offset by the force of photons racing from the core of a star This holds the temperature and size of the active nuclear core of all stars as roughly stable during the main lifetime. These massive stars burn out in a 100 million years or so, there isn't enough time nor the right materials for complex life yet. But, when the first super massive stars went super nova the explosions were so massive that nearly all the heavy elements like, carbon, oxygen, mercury, past iron and right up the periodic table were created for the first time. A super nova of one massive star can give off many times more energy than an entire galaxy during the explosion (a few weeks to months is how long they explode for basically). The early universe would have been a cauldron of massive stars blowing up and decimating each other for aeon's.
Next the universe cools a bit and again clouds of dust from the original super novas congregate into rotating spheres and the formation of standard sized stars (including yellow dwarfs like our sun) begins. Stars that are of 10 billion year lifetimes instead of only a 100 million.
Now things are set; stars that last a long time, material not pulled into the forming stars finds stable orbits around a home star and becomes planets. Many types of elements and simple molecules spread out throughout solar systems from volcanic explosions, comets and asteroids. Finally, after the age of the violent stellar nurseries (matter collecting itself only to be flung out into the universe in a repeating atomic ping-pong building process), matter finally comes to rest in a calm environment. Some time later, for the first time, something peculiar...
Bio-Genesis; The Origins of Life (The beginning of the process of the universe to know itself)
Most likely a rather simple self-replicating-shaped molecule formed; the first Lego of Life. One method for producing complex molecules from simple molecules is to smash them with high pressure such as an asteroid impact.
Low probability events happen all the time. The eye has developed at least 7 times in nature across completely separate branches of the tree of life. Richard Dawkins does a wonderful job demonstrating the development of the eye during his presentation entitled "growing up in the universe" check out on youtube: " Richard Dawkins Evolution of the Eye Part 1". A low probability multiplied by a huge number of chances approaches 1... certainty. Mountains are of low probability but they are all over. Pressure and time is all that took; a process the character Andy Dufresne understood clearly.
The evolution of life is a combination of random mutation and natural selection with a few tid bits of other interactions that allow information to go from one gene pool to another (usually via viruses). An example of how evolutions works...
A particular population of bird with an average beak length enjoys the nectar of a certain flower. The geographical area that these birds live in heats up for whatever reason. The plants that mutate/adapt to have deeper flowers (that protect the fluid from evaporation just a little better than its neighbors) are more likely to transmit their DNA (pollen attached to visitors) to the next generation. The birds that mutate to have longer beaks have an easier time surviving and passing on genes and the plants with deeper flowers have a better chance of passing on genes. Simply put; change in environment drives evolution. Too much change, though, and the population cannot mutate (adapt) quickly enough and an extinction occurs.
Huge percentages of life have been wiped off the planet in a geologic-blink-of-an-eye. The asteroid that hit 66 million years ago was the exit of the non-feathered and large dinosaurs along with a lot of other life. There have been five major extinctions on the planet so far with a potential sixth extinction starting on our watch. Also, we were on the endangered species list at one time as we were down to 3000 to 5000 humans on the planet before someone realized the Savanna was killing us and we had to leave home.
The universe is 13.7 billion years old. Galaxies formed within the first 2 billion years, at least, according to the "deep field" images taken by the Hubble telescope. Our solar system is about 4.5 billion years old. We find the first fossils from about 3.8 billion years ago, however, much simpler life existed before this. But, because simpler life forms would never have had a skeleton yet (nothing to fossilize) we simply aren't going to find evidence of the first life of the planet. Most importantly though; after the planet cooled life got going right away... Life seems inevitable.
Are you out there? "Otherwise it would seem like an awful waste of space".
"An old friend" The Drake Equation
N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fl = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.
When throwing reasonable numbers into the equation the results range anywhere from 5 civilizations a year that exist for us to get to know up to higher numbers into the thousands in the galaxy. However, a parameter that probably has more effect than expected is that we base our understanding of functioning societies as always being on the brink of failure. However, war per capita has been ever decreasing since the beginning of recorded history (good job Steven Pinker in your TED.com talk entitled "a brief history of violence"). Which means one can expect a tipping point where technology, education and peace allows for a civilization to end war, leave their home planet and, eventually, their home solar system. Somebody said once; "When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace".
At this point things are different and exploration of the galaxy would happen somewhat quickly. Something like a 100 million to a billion years to explore the galaxy basically. These numbers are reached by asking how long would it take one civilization to spread out at 1/10,000 the speed of light and fill the galaxy with probes (think of the monolith from 2001 A Space Odyssey here) and eventually people or whatever (but I'm guessing this can be done a lot faster). Our galaxy is several billion years older than our solar system and some neighboring stars are two to 3 billion years older than us. If life comes early in solar systems and intelligent life comes somewhat later (for us half way through the lifetime of our sun) and you look at how many stars there are in our galaxy (about 400 billion) and that we have found over 1200 planets in orbit about nearby stars; the question has to be asked... where is everybody?
Notable Scientific Achievements with approximate dates
This will sound a little odd but the first human to make a new tool of any kind; 100,000 to 250,000 years ago. The Clovis Tip (early hunting tool) and the control of fire is where we started. And, honestly, some human had to be the first to look up at those tiny points of light in the night sky and think "what those are me wonder?".
Then sometime later human males stopped killing everything for a minute and some human minds got a chance to think.
Nicolaus Copernicus 1543 Recognized the observed retrograde motion of planets as the indication that the sun is at the center of the solar system. The solar system has just figured out what it looks like.
Johannes Kepler Early 1600's Orbits of planets follow math and are then predictable. Planets fan out equal area in equal time during the transit of an elliptical shaped orbit. He wrote a book called "The Somnium" (The Dream) about traveling to the moon and visiting the life that lives there. Sadly, in the story he made his mom the person that told him how to get there and this likely contributed to his mom being labeled a witch. Get a grip people.
Galileo Galilei 1642 Gravity seems to exist and works by something that can be described by math. Invented the telescope and was the first to find a few of the moons of Jupiter. Was placed under house arrest due to his conflicting views of the world to that of the catholic cult.
Isaac Newton 1660 Rules of motion and calculus; the big boy language of science and very solid approaches to astronomy. First workable gravity equations. Initial work on optics and workable logic based on light behaving as a ray with wave like properties.
Charles Darwin 1882 "The Origin of Species" Adaptation with natural selection baby! My vote for the biggest idea of all time. Talk about the box being a dot!
James Clerk Maxwell 1861 EM field equations. Which I don't understand yet. Thanks, u of arizona physics department; assholes.
Neils Bohr 1922 Nobel Prize. Electrons orbit the nucleus. Bohr was an alcoholic hermit.
Nikola Tesla Early 1900's 1700 patents. Like most of these guys he did a ton of important stuff. Perhaps the first attempt by humans at anti-gravity or something in that realm of physics. He died broke and likely insane after a lifelong pursuit to improve the plight humanity. But being a poor businessman resulted in JP Morgan and Edison burying his ideas and destroying him financially. He believed he received alien contact at one time via clicks from one of his devices. In the end he lived alone with pigeons (whom he called his only friends) and by this time I believe he was insane. The FBI illegally seized all his work from his apartment after he died stating a law that didn't apply to his level of citizenship. Wow Nikola, I wish things had been different for you.
Albert Einstein 1916 E=mc^2 and relativity (the relationship of gravity, space and time) He received his Noble prize for the photoelectric effect; why metals spark in a microwave and the relationship between photon frequency and its energy (he worked with Plank on this). Like many of these guys Albert also struggled with his sanity. The worst period was in his early 20's. One of his children was terribly schizophrenic (which is genetic). Against his will his brain was autopsied in an attempt to understand the uniqueness of his mental abilities. I have a real soft spot for him; throughout my difficulties during high school counselors and social workers often talked about him. Something about his weaknesses, not his strengths, was the point they were attempting to get through to me.
Max Plank 1918 Nobel Prize for Planks constant: a relationship between energy, space and time that defined quantum mechanics and what is called "the standard model". The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is consitent with this model.
Carl Sagan RIP 1996 Worked a lifetime to bring astronomy and science into the living rooms of all. Helped to develop the SETI program (The Search For Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) while fighting the scientific establishment in doing so. He was as much of a poet as he was an astronomer. Check out "the pale blue dot" on youtube if you don't know this man. He wrote many books including the book/video series Cosmos and the book/movie Contact. (My favorite movie. I left the theater feeling an emotion I had never felt before; I need that feeling again).
The rest of this is iffy for so many reasons but so was every hypothesis before it became a working theory. I want to add at this time I am wrong a lot, this is a difficult subject and I want to believe, so ya, you have been warned. Don't take my word for it, do your own research and think for yourself! Here we go...
Podkletnov 1997 Anti-gravity (believed by a subculture) I heard rumors of this when in school for physics at the University of Minnesota in 1998. I heard that a russian physicist achieved anti-gravity (kinda guessing it was this guy we heard about) and then barricaded himself in his apartment. Running to his apartment is probably a sign that what he had planed for this technology did not go his way.
Eugene F. Mallove Killed 2004 after a 2 hour interview on "Coast to Coast" about "free" energy and ufos. He ran a magazine about energy and worked to get these fringy type of scientists (who are almost always semi-nuts) to work together. Subscriptions to his work from 40 countries and he was killed, no contest... NOT good.
Ning-Li University of Alabama Current. Reportedly achieved anti-gravity and is the center of a conspiracy as to where she is now.
Frank Znidarsic Current. Released equations that describe the transition of natural forces. This is suppose to lead to cold fusion and anti-gravity (believed by a subculture). I made it a little over half way through verifying the math on this before my skills ran out.
AlienScientist Youtube and the net. Is doing a lot to organize the current ideas about anti-gravity and ufo technology. Is currently attempting to reproduce the NASA super conductor anti-grav experiment. I have correspondence with him from time to time and I really hope his popularity is big enough to save his ass if he does figure out something big. (GL m8!) An analogy I have heard AlienScientist describe gives perspective on the bumbles of science (think string-theory here) called the fractal/universe analogy.
There are many others out there fighting for the good-fight but I don't know of you. Feel free enough? Please say hello.
The Fractal/Universe Analogy - A distractifying side note.
In the fractal/universe analogy let the seed equation of some fractal pattern represents the fundamental equation of the universe; the equation that describes the interactions of the natural forces with energy-space-time. An example of why we are struggling to understand the universe is analogous to observing a portion of a fractal pattern, such as a cross section, trying to understand it and getting down-right confused. This would happen because as you would look across the pattern and see high points and low points, then discover a relationship between the bumps, create a set of math rules that models this and then accidentally believe you have figured out the fundamental equation of what you are observing (it would have to be an algorithm though, with confusing incoherent limits, which is not going to be the seed equation nor would it look anything like it).
The analogy here tells us why the standard model of physics is so difficult to understand, doesn't work outside of specific domains, why so many forces of nature are thought to exist and why the math of upper dimensions gets thrown in; (Garrett; you've got something there with the E8 (and my dream life, oh man props) but I really don't think it's what you think it is). All of this is done to force the math to fit the data; the math is fine (and somewhat useful) but the physics is off. Sadly, this means that the mind-scattering physics still being taught at universities "the standard model" represents a paradoxical-seeming misinterpretation; a schizophrenic-appearing universe. God may play dice with the universe but he is not out of his mind despite the evidence to the contrary. Once the fundamental "whopper" equation of the universe is discovered it will be a 1 to 2 inch long equation when written down on paper, displayed on a monitor or worn as a tattoo =]
Is the biggest moment in the history of history on the horizon?
Yeah... Small course correction.
First some anecdotal stuff and then the science; the stuff that drops the jaw to the floor, so stick with it, we'll get there. Info exists earlier than the following events but the level of confidence one can have on pre-electricity fringy stuff is low. There are books-worth of accounts of ufos being observed by radar and numerous people on the ground at the same time. Reports of troubled ufos being chased across the usa with the resulting wreckage always collected and witnesses silenced. These guys ain't perfect. The reports come in, a small blurb in the paper comes out, and everyone goes back to their lives; except in one town...
Roswell 1947 A flying disk in the time of the typewriter. I'll talk a bit more about this event later. By the way; if anyone knows someone with crazy advanced NASA style optics resolution software let me know. There is a huge digital image of the letter held by general Ramey in which the face of the paper was towards the camera. There may be some important evidence that can be extracted from this letter. Info about where the disk was taken and the cover-story and such. Some attempts at recovering this info have been made with (hard-to-believe success, but I don't trust the guy that did the work; he seemed way too eager. However, I have an idea that no one that I know of has tried yet and thats all I'm going to say about that. I visited Roswell with a friend in 2000 (Thanks so much Chet) and this was a strange town, whoa. Oh, and on the highway leading into town from the southwest (near mexico) there are road signs that read "do not pick up aliens". LOL frikn brilliant! and a little "sad", but ya.
Capital buzzed by ufos July 28th 1952 In the newspapers of the time.
Edgar Fueche Claims to understand some of the physics of ufo propulsion from working in area 51. Has worked with the TR-3B (which seems to be real, ours and probably part of the aurora project). This is probably the result of us replicating alien technology. He speaks like a scientist, doesn't run with stories when the listener gets to excited about what their hearing and seems psychologically sound.
Phoenix 1997 A massive ufo sighted by thousands including the governor of the state who is now a believer. Reportedly, this looked like a huge swept-wing (think B2 shaped) black soundless craft. One observer said that he felt that 40 B2 stealth bombers could have been landed on the craft (as his way of saying it was big).
Accounts by many military officers and soldiers saying that multiple nukes can be turned off by a ufo in the area. This has been going on for years.
Belgium TR-3B sighting and photos. The application of the anti-grav technology in the TR-3B seems less impressive than a flying disk "sports model" if what I have seen about the design of this craft and what I think I know about anti-gravity is anywhere close to right.
Phobos 1 and 2 mars space probes. 2 russian probes developed by 40 countries were sent to photograph mars and its moonlit phobos. Each sent back images from mars. One of what I'll call a mother ship (the last image sent by the probe supposedly), and the other a shadow on mars of a 300 mile long something (mother ship) moving along the surface of mars and an image of a shadow of what appears to be a massive flying disk. Mother ship refers to the huge symmetric cigar shaped ufos; so nothing that looks like an asteroid, comet, moonlit or moon.
So, 40 countries to produce multiple fake images of multiple huge objects that are moving and should not have been there... really?
Catholic church reverses its opinion on if there could more life in the universe. Saying ya its possible. Within the last couple years they said this.
United Nations appoints Extra Terrestrial Ambassador for when we get contact. 2010. Cool job if it was publicly-funded and more internet apparent. hmm... Maybe something initiated through TED.com.
A majority of the american public, some of the scientific establishment, much of the entrainment industry and a few institutions of control agree; there might be someone out there. It's as if we are in the process of being sociologically prepared for contact.
Story Time
A story about science and motivation (true or not) goes as follows... "Several scientists are brought into a room. They are shown a video of some military personnel inside a stadium with a redheaded "geeky" looking scientist hooked up to an anti-gravity personnel flying device. This was a demonstration for proof of concept. The video goes on to show the scientist flying about the stadium then, when about to land, the device explodes killing the scientist. Upon seeing the video the scientists in the room are asked to figure out how he did it (probably not the exploding part I would guess). One year later a crude mock up was created by the scientists; it was able to create anti-gravity. The device was a stack of metal rings that when charged up would show a reduction in gravity. After showing their work to the project leader, the project leader invited someone into the room; a redheaded "geeky" looking actor walked in..."
Ok, I have hinted enough at anti-gravity... What is going on here?
Seats and trays to their forward upright position please; we are set for takeoff in 2 minutes. There seems to be an anti-gravity effect created by rotating a super conductor at high velocities. A breaking of the conservation of angular momentum occurs. NASA levitated a $600,000 super conductor via magnetic fields then rotated it quickly and noticed a small "gravitational anomaly" (anti-gravity). The whole experiment was a deception to say "go home folks... nothing to see here". They ruled the effect to be to small to be of any practical use. According to the math the effect goes by the square of the radius, meaning, small is not the way to go here and NASA used a one or 2 cm disk. NASA: Never A Straight Answer.
What seems to be the real way to achieve the big boy anti-gravity effect is to rotate a dense fluid at some ratio of the speed of light. I would start at about 1/300 the speed of light (at the outer edge) due to some data produced from a handful of cold fusion experiments suggesting a transfer of energy occurs between forces at this velocity. The holy grail material needs to be a magnetic frictionless fluid (a thermionic super-fluid). It appears that mercury doped with some magnetic elements, that must also act to prevent mercury from freezing at low temperatures, is the solution here. Next, fill a thin toroid (donut-shaped container) with this fluid, super-cool it (this may require quasi-crystals to pull enough heat out), and apply high pressure so that the fluid becomes a Boise-Einstein Condensate; the wave property of matter allows matter to occupy the same space per time as it becomes one overlapping wave function when super-cooled and under pressure. This is how you would prevent friction and get the most bang for your buck in terms of utilizing all the spinning mass; if one part goes, it all goes. Finally, rotate the fluid inside the toroid quickly using EM fields of some sort, a degree of freedom opens up, and presto; something magical happens. Mercury Vortex Propulsion! And by the way, what shape would a craft be if its primary propulsion system was in the shape of a large-circumference thin-tubed toroid covered by a hull with a bit of aerodynamics thrown around it?... BiNGO!
Fun huh?
Out of orbit now
At this point I'm going to talk about a certain scientist as I unwind and speak more loosely. Getting to the punchline there was a bit grueling... thanks for sticking with it.
Eric Beaubien (youtube: Bantokfomoki) Current. Released equations that dismiss the nuclear forces by reducing the forces of the observed effect as a relationship between gravity and EM fields only and his interpretation of inertia. This is 2 forces of nature and better physics instead of 4 forces of nature. Solid reasons not to believe in dark matter as this effect is reduced to a tiny push from the relaxation of the EM field of the universe. (Think of cheerios clumping in milk from relaxing surface tension) Like extra gravity around a galaxy, just a little extra push from empty space (because of canceling relative vectors) mostly towards the edges of galaxies pushing matter into clumps and getting the edges of galaxies to spin a bit faster (a noticeable effect and the reason we look for dark matter in the first place). This would also account for why the pioneer satellite is not quite as far away as it should be by our current understanding of the universe. He also has pointed out a blatantly obvious miss interpretation of Newtons gravitational force equations which removes all reason to look for gravitons.
When I think of it, and I have correspondence via email from time to time with Eric (he is very "patient" with my ideas; thanks by the way), he very well could be the next Einstein (swinging from his nuts a bit here lol). I say this specifically because of his methods of reaching for mathematical solutions and tweaks of current theories that make solid sense as well as consistently simplify the physics of how the universe seems to work (think of the fractal/universe analogy). His main goal is the anti-gravity effect; what he calls reaction-less propulsion. Propulsion that breaks free from the limits of Choksy's rocket equations. He is motivated by a belief in aliens and what propulsion systems they "must" be using. In your language Eric... No question you are taking some major league cuts here but I'm pretty sure you are fowling off some straight back too; if not better.
Myself; I'm just trying to get to "first" base with some adults of the galaxy. The heavens don't blow up every night so I know there is peace in space.
Taking a spin around a black hole to clear our mind before heading back to earth =[
If I'm right the universe is giving us an example of working anti-gravity near black holes. Which is consistent with how we have learned other tricks of the universe; we look around and see what nature is up to. After all, there can't be infinite gravity, right? Infinity is a concept not a quantifiable value; the universe needs values to process.
Since I'm near enough to a black hole to feel its gravity and I remain in existence I would say there is no infinite gravity anywhere near a black hole. Infinity would have to be getting divided or subtracted by something so as to not collapse the universe and what could that possibly be? Hypothetically, the entire energy of the universe (in kinetic form) moving one tiny particle would not be able to find a safe velocity if an infinite gravity well existed anywhere in the universe. Infinite means hypothetical in my mind. The concept of infinity is a logic tool nothing more.
I think the anti-grav effect (a breaking of angular momentum) happens just outside the black hole. Eventually, matter at the right combination of state, pressure, velocity and charge (stabilizing factors analogous to what holds the core of a star stable) then, like an opening suction cup above a river, a degree of freedom becomes accessible and matter shoots upward or downward (depending on proximity) to a near orthogonal angel to rotation. Pressure wins over matter-waves attempting to separate due to heat then matter takes a turn. A tiny escape clause that prevents the universe from destroying itself. Discovering infinity and understanding it, by looking at a black hole, is how we get out of the solar system!
In my minds eye the exit cone comes to a point then to cone again as it extends from the top/bottom of a black hole. Think of 2 cones touching tip-to-tip with one of the bottoms sitting on a black hole far above the equator (closer to a pole) and then 2 more tip-touching-cones extending from the bottom (usually). We see no scattered debris from this circle of intersection because the state-of-matter is still that of a Biose-Einstein condensate. Or something, I don't understand yet but I think I'm a lot closer as I'm starting to see them.
A war inside my head
Everything from here on out is my opinions most of which are based on conclusions I arrive at due to the mind-spinning implications of the Home Run Paragraph.
Now think of the previous story (the scientists being fooled into believing anti-gravity to be real and then going ahead and doing it themselves), ufos displaying incredible accelerations and what that could mean in terms of them giving us the proof that there is some big boy physics (anti-gravity for one) yet to be figured out. This, along with the slow disclosure process idea (see below, but not important yet), indicates that ufo's have a purpose. Or, conversely, (and here is the argument as I see it) all the ufos are us and somehow we figured out one of the most difficult physics tricks in the universe completely on our own with no indication there was a trick to be figured out, completely in secret, before the time when we could drop nukes (which we had an example of (the sun) and took half the scientists in the usa to do), before compact-computers and before we got to the moon... something is off here, way off.
In other words I see 5 options here:
(A) One has to believe we started anti-grav and had huge success quickly (could build and control a craft) before dropping nukes (1945), nuclear reactors (1951, which is a control of nuclear reactions not the exploding of them and may be required as a power source for an anti-grav craft anyway) and before the moon landing and we didn't use this propulsion system to get to the moon.
I propose options C is more likely than option A because... In option A anti-gravity seems to occur before a number of other accomplishments that (to me) are NOT in the right chronological order in terms of the understanding of prerequisite sciences and engineering for the building and control of a flying disk.
Lets just say we could build and fly that advanced of a flying disk as what crashed in Roswell 1947 (wincing at the chances of this), with development time that would have been longer than the A-bomb, this would have started in germany I figure. [There are no other mass collections of scientists not working on the bomb other than germans (1945 minus A-bomb development time time-frame)]. This would make the development of anti-grav start years earlier, before computers, completely in the dark, with no reason to know it could be figured out and before we knew how to drop a nuke.
The only way I can see humans possibly doing this with no outside help is something related to someone jacking Teslas' ideas (if he was even close in the first place), the nazi bell, and the biggest psy-op of all time. Did someone accidentally figure this out then start a perfectly-functioning self-perpetuating alien myth around it, or, did the germans find a clue in the skies that got them going on anti-grav in the first place? Or, and I'm reaching here, has something been going on, behind closed doors in our history for a much much longer period of time?
The brain looks for patterns in the chaos and I think mine has found something here. When considering the average looking disk shaped ufo, the chances of "lies of supposed witnesses" just happening to describe a craft capable of anti-grav, and what the nazi bell looked like and considering the last few paragraphs and finally combining "Occum's Razor" with a whopping 400 billion stars; I think it's time to start looking up.
The Disclosure Process (An adaptive prime directive)
Throughout human history every time an advanced culture has made contact with a primitive culture the primitive culture has been destroyed. Even when every attempt to prevent this was seemingly applied. When we get contact from an alien civilization we will be the primitive culture. We know this and they know this. So what is the solution?
My guess is a slow precisely-timed disclosure process that allows for a percentage of EYE WITNESSES and "believers" to "spread the word" into the social consciousness. This reduces the shock value when official contact occurs by inducing preparation in many aspects of life (mostly entertainment) akin to shows such as Star Trek.
Balancing factors on the rate of disclosure of an advanced space fairing civilization with a primitive planet-bound culture would span a range of topics such as:
How aware the culture is of the process of science and the existence of the principles of evolution?
How technologically advanced is the culture?
Is the culture trying to become space-fairing?
What is the likelihood of breaking social cohesion or inducing war?
What dangers would sharing technology pose to the primitive culture?
What dangers to the galaxy would the primitive culture pose when either arriving at or having advanced technology shared with them?
The incredible dangers of physics tricks yet to be discovered by us does not fit well with the idea of a primitive war like culture (us) getting off their home planet so there could be a level of containment involved. But I wouldn't sweat it; angry children in a house full of potential weapons should stay in their crib for safety's sake (especially with neighbors around) until they grow out of it. Our obstetricians would be making a mistake by pushing a waring culture ahead or allowing a primitive culture out of their solar system, give or take, before the culture is ready to play nice.
My guess is that the nuke testing changed something and they began to interact way more with us before we or they were prepared. As a result higher than expected losses have hurt both sides. Each party (one of us slowly) is learning how to interact with the other under a nuclear-pressure-cooker of circumstances.
So, what do you think, are they here?
Myself, I can't say "i know it" to you, but this paper has been quite the journey. I think my left brain believes from a statistical thing but my right brain needs the experience of the galactic big hello or something more low-key and personnel (hint buds?). I am aware of the religious overtones/brain functions at play here and the idea of the self-perpetuating myth and that something in me needs this, but there is science here, and (again) 400 billion stars in the galaxy and anti-grav-star-craft on the planet before we could have done it, right?
All this has changed my opinion on the chances that they are here, that we are watched, somewhat protected, and perhaps contained a bit, and by this time, no doubt rooted for! Oh man, after all this time they must be getting near the edge of their seats, super-cooling the space champagne and placing bets on when their algorithm deems us ready for the "galactic big hello".
A fun opportunity (Closer to home)
If indeed we have galactic obstetricians I would say the planet no longer has to fear a big asteroid impact. But, I would much rather go down in the books as not needing help after we don't need it. So, lets go after Apophis and change the low chance (1/1000) it will hit us in 2036 into a zero chance and enjoy the pride in doing so. Imagine, the world uniting to take destiny into our own hands. How would that change our view of ourselves? We have landed a probe on a comet now. All it would take is a number of properly placed ion drives and some time to redirect even a big asteroid, it's not that difficult. I would prefer to do it with anti-grav though, little more style to it. Maybe skip it along the surface of the sun like skipping a rock over a pond, get some solar data while we are at it, plus some awesome images. And, the kinda funny thing about this is; the first one to fix the orbit of Apophis wins!
By the way, about 10 years ago a one mile wide asteroid crossed the path of the earths orbit. Big deal right? 6 hours earlier we were in that spot! The one that got the dinosaurs was probably 5 miles wide, this would have been lights out folks. Apophis will pass, at least, between earth and our space satellites; I don't think we should just watch this one; this is a perfectly-timed great opportunity to show everyone what we got.
About humanity and in conclusion
Almost back to earth here except there is this damned-soapbox in my way. I have little doubt this will sound offensive to many... sorry.
Humans are now 100% dependent on technology and if we loose our ability to find ever-increasing energy sources we will collapse quickly. Currently our struggles are more about corruption, religion and a lacking in the type of education that helps people develop their critical thinking skills, more than a lacking in our ability to figure out science and technological solutions. In my opinion our social structures suck, our education all but sucks, but the ability of individuals to figure stuff out rocks. Just as in evolution, before a population can move forward an individual must lead the way. Everything at TED.com proves to me that the better the education, the better one can take care of ones self and when basic needs are taken care of the human spirit can't help but to reach out to help others. An idea worth spreading perhaps.
People united in the cause-for-good is the last thing the monsters in charge want. Caring Kills Corruption. Our animalistic self-appointed masters (that can't help but to keep playing monopoly with peoples' lives) want people to buy into the money-chasing zombification of the mind; people are easier to control and more predictable this way. And honestly, everyone this TV-driven mass-hypnosis thing is really hard to watch from the outside. Turn it off and leave it off, please. After a few months something changes... And really, either way on aliens, doesn't this human story we have going here seem pretty fascinating and worthy of participation?
I would say the defining principle that is currently holding us back is the "manipulation of scarcity" maintained by the "men", excuse me, rat bastard sadistic animal "children" behind the curtain. Check out Peter Joseph and his documentary Zeitgeist Final Edition for what seems to be the best collection of what lies under the surface. The rabbit-hole this opens up is undeniable and I wish none of it was true. I volunteered during 911 with the Red Cross for a few days answering the calls of the frantic and, like the rest of us, I was betrayed that day and every day since. But, this fight is long from over. As the criminal-fuk nixon said "it's not the crime that gets ya, it's the cover up". If you know your physics there is no question to 911; gravity didn't change its mind that day. Jesse Ventura + Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth gogogo!
But on the bright side, I think we will make it. It's going to be a little rocky as religion and money get squeezed out. Institutions that destroy the mind; that obviously humanity can't cope with much longer (we need to keep insanely close track of every nuke) but It's looking good; baby steps, over time, can move mountains. As Christopher Hitchens said "Religion was our first attempt at explaining the world therefore it was our worst; now we have science". I would add to that: If religion was true and science was false ambulances would rush the injured to churches. I suppose though, if we do wipe ourselves out (enough nukes to kill 8 billion when there isn't 7 billion on the planet yet, and that's just the first day; not rational yet people) or get beat by something in nature, the planet will most likely, eventually, produce a new intelligent life form that can have at it (perhaps the Bonobos if our exit doesn't ruin the place to much). Our odds are good though I swear it lol. I really don't think anyone in charge of many nukes is going to launch: the whole thing was a fear-based money-making example of the military industrial complex gone bazerk; what Eisenhower warned us about. And now we got 15000 nukes, each one able to unleash the explosive energy of world war 2. As Carl said, "A world war 2 every second for a few hours of unforgivable neglect". But, the internet is here, a billion strong and growing, information sharing and the slow dismantling of the mass-media propaganda machine; 1/7th of everyone with a voice so far. The political-devolution has begun a new global-power is emerging.
Ok, off my soapbox and on to the end.
Because the universe is flying apart faster and faster and there does not appear to be even close to enough mass in the universe to make it collapse it is expected that the universe will expanded faster and faster until the end of time. This means that galaxies will hold together due to local gravity but the distance between galaxies will increase faster and faster. Eventually, life developing in a galaxy 100 billion years from now will never see a single photon from another galaxy. They will have no clue the universe is either expanding, or for that matter, even out there. They will have no information of the big bang and yet every piece of physics they learn will not be wrong. Which begs the question.. to them, was there a beginning? Every time I read that last sentence my brain stalls out lol.
The end of the universe will be what is called "heat death"; the universe will decay to nothing but incoherent photons of mostly low energy. The last of the most stable particles will decay into photons and the universe will have its last interaction (photons do not interact with photons)? The universe will continue to expand from empty space and more and more distance will exist between photons. Time, velocity and distance will become effectively meaningless as no other reference frame will exist relative to any transmission of energy/information. Forever, two photons will race towards each other but because the distance between them is so great and the universe is expanding at an ever increasing rate, they will be forever falling further and further apart... the end.
Thank you for the time,
On The Horizon
How long before you rid me of this nightmare?
I can't see any way out of this, |